By: Yale School of Public Health Researchers
Authors: Alison P Galvani, PhD; Alyssa S Parpia, MPH; Eric M Foster; Burton H Singer, PhD; and Meagan C Fitzpatrick, PhD
Published: December 2020
Financed by: No financing.
Legislation analyzed: S. 1804 Medicare for All Act of 2017

Download the Report from the The Lancet.

The article is available for free from The Lancet if you have registered for an account on the site. We are not able to provide the article file on this site, though!

Author's Summary

Although health care expenditure per capita is higher in the USA than in any other country, more than 37 million Americans do not have health insurance, and 41 million more have inadequate access to care. Efforts are ongoing to repeal the Affordable Care Act which would exacerbate health-care inequities. By contrast, a universal system, such as that proposed in the Medicare for All Act, has the potential to transform the availability and efficiency of American health-care services. Taking into account both the costs of coverage expansion and the savings that would be achieved through the Medicare for All Act, we calculate that a single-payer, universal health-care system is likely to lead to a 13% savings in national health-care expenditure, equivalent to more than US$450 billion annually (based on the value of the US$ in 2017). The entire system could be funded with less financial outlay than is incurred by employers and households paying for health-care premiums combined with existing government allocations. This shift to single-payer health care would provide the greatest relief to lower-income households. Furthermore, we estimate that ensuring health-care access for all Americans would save more than 68 000 lives and 1·73 million life-years every year compared with the status quo.