The Grand Bargain is a Grand Lie

Why the scheme being negotiated in Washington is one-sided and totally unfair

By Cenk Uygur for Common Dreams

First of all, let’s establish that no one in Washington actually cares about balancing the budget. If they did, they would love this so-called Fiscal Cliff. It raises taxes and cuts spending, so it would massively reduce the deficit. Isn’t that what all of Washington has been pretending to care about all of this time?

Second, understand that this so-called compromise they are talking about in order to avoid this supposed calamity is a trick. In fact, it’ll be the greatest robbery in American history. Think about it — they say they are worried about all those tax increases and spending cuts. But that’s not true. The Grand Bargain would dramatically increase spending cuts, not alleviate them. So, in fact, the only thing they care about is paying less taxes, as always.

Right now, according to the sequester $1.2 trillion in spending cuts are set to take place if nothing happens. Half of that would come from defense. Of course, this is the real problem because there’s no way the defense contractors are going to allow that. Whenever people in Washington complain about spending cuts they mean spending cuts that would affect defense contractors. They want to massively increase spending cuts everywhere else in the budget.

President Obama has proposed that the Grand Bargain include $4 trillion in savings. He has said over and over again that the ratio would be $3 in spending cuts to $1 in tax increases. This is before his legendarily disastrous negotiating begins. So, let’s do some quick math. According to the president’s own plan that would be $3 trillion in spending cuts, which is significantly higher than the current plan of $1.2 trillion in spending cuts.

Let me add one other fact, if all you do is let the Bush tax cuts expire for people making over $250,000, you would already have $1 trillion in tax increases. And we were told because of this election that was already non-negotiable. That’s what we fought to make sure would happen and the president has guaranteed it. So, what exactly do progressives gain out of this Grand Bargain?

The reality is that this is cost shifting. They are going to move the spending cuts away from defense and on to the middle class and poor by hacking away at Medicare and Medicaid. This is defined as courageous in Washington. What a load of crap. What would be courageous is taking on the rich and the powerful and the large political donors, which is the exact opposite of what’s going to happen.

President Obama has already promised corporate tax cuts (from 35 percent to 28 percent). Think about that. Why are we doing tax cuts if we are trying to reduce the deficit? The administration tells us not to worry because they will close some loopholes and make it revenue neutral. But wait a minute, I thought the whole point was not to make it revenue neutral. I thought we were trying to raise revenue.

There’s a good chance they’ll pull this same kind of crap on income taxes, after all, if they wanted to raise a trillion in revenue all they would have to do is do nothing. Once the Bush tax cuts expire, you re-instate the middle class tax cuts and voila, you’re done. That way, you don’t have to give up anything in return!

Yet, the White House is planning to give up at least $3 trillion in spending cuts anyway. If you were progressive, if you cared about the middle class, if you were honest, why in the world would you do that? The reality is that this robbery is indefensible and my math here is irrefutable, that’s why they will do this deal as quickly as possible. The more people think about it, the more they have a chance to get enraged. The Democrats and Republicans have to agree to this deal in the lame duck session before the public realizes their pocket has been picked.

They’re going to raise the Medicare eligibility age even though Medicare costs less than private insurance to the country overall. That’s not going to save us any money; it’s going to cost us money. But it will shift money from the middle class who would get the benefits of those years of Medicare to private insurance companies and to the rich in the form of extra tax cuts they finance in the federal budget.

If you think these politicians have your best interest in mind, then you’re living in an alternate reality. And are you telling me that no one else in the media did the simplest math in the world on this? They also don’t want you to know (they don’t want to know themselves, that’s why they avoid thinking about the obvious problems in this charade), because they’re also rich and powerful. The money gets shifted to them. So, why would they want to tell you about how you are about to get robbed?

The Grand Bargain is a Grand Lie. Anyone who argues for it is either a fool or a charlatan. If President Obama was anything but the establishment hack that he is, he would never consider it. There is nothing wrong with compromise, but this isn’t compromise. This is a robbery.


  1. Lydia Rodriguez on November 20, 2012 at 12:26 pm

    Obama needs to stop hoodwinking us. All they need to do right now is listen to Bernie Sanders. In January we will have more big mouths who are willing to stand up for us-Fl. Rep. Alan Grayson and Mass. Elizabeth Warren.

    • Lorin Jones on November 20, 2012 at 4:51 pm

      I agree. Bernie Sanders is the best man in Washington. And Obama has a long was to go to be the President I would be extremely proud of. He is too much of the establishment, and that’s a sad statement about a person that I thought would try and be his own man, rather than somebody elses. I voted for him. I do think he was the lesser of the two evils, but he’s not the savior of this nation for certain. He’s just a politician that may be a little better than some of the others. He might make me change my mind. I hope so.

  2. ter badger on November 20, 2012 at 12:31 pm

    They should raise the cap on Social Security, maybe raise the Medicare contribution on everyone and have a $5 copay. Then drop the eligibility age to 60. That will let many people retire and open up jobs for the unemployed. Of course to start with they need to let the Bush tax cuts die.

  3. Erik Jirgens on November 20, 2012 at 12:40 pm

    We need austerity not for S.S or medicare medicaid, but for banksters wall street gangsters.

    • Denise Libien on November 20, 2012 at 2:58 pm

      Yea- when did the conversation turn from Wall Street f***ing everything up to the solution is cutting social security and Medicare?

  4. Jeff Joseph on November 20, 2012 at 9:21 pm

    We need to write letters not email and send them to the White House to get Obama’s atten so he doesn’t sell us out again.
    Can you imagine the impact that would have. Better we should send them to Bernie Sanders office and let him take them to the WH.

  5. Bruce on November 29, 2012 at 11:22 pm

    And BarBarack Zer0bama is the epitomous lying DEM RENEGER!

  6. other on April 26, 2013 at 6:05 pm

    Some men cannot use farmacia on line, including men who have diabetes do
    not respond to requests for comment.