By Sam Stein for the Huffington Post

The market concentration for health insurance is so monopolized in some areas that insurance companies are willing to raise prices and lose customers in an effort to improve their bottom line, a leading insurance broker told Wall Street analysts on Wednesday.

In a conference call organized by Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Steve Lewis, a highly regarded broker at the world’s third largest insurance broker, Willis, painted a picture of the health insurance market in which employers seem likely to be priced out of coverage.

Noting that “price competition” between insurers was “down from a year ago,” Lewis relayed that “incumbent carriers seem more willing than ever to walk away from existing business.”

The phenomenon of insurers pricing their policies beyond where consumers can afford it seems to be already taking place. Last month Anthem Blue Cross told customers it would hike their health insurance premiums by as much as 39 percent (with the expectation that some would drop coverage altogether). In December, the Huffington Post reported that Aetna was planning on losing more than 600,000 customers by raising prices on their consumers in 2010.

Insurers are able to do this in part because the markets in which they operate have no adequate competition, suggests Lewis. The broker noted that “the smaller client segment” was “increasingly frustrated” with the renewal of their coverage and was “evaluating potential self-funding with stop loss protection” instead. Lewis added that employers in many markets knew “that they’re not going to be able to trade down pricing very significantly” (i.e. find cheaper coverage) and, as such, would likely only change plans or become self-insured if there was a “fairly significant” disruption in service.

“As I mentioned at the outset, it was without a doubt the most challenging renewal cycle in my 20 years of this business with employers really struggling with how and what was going to drive their decision, combined with the lack of aggressive and competitive pricing in the marketplace,” Lewis said.

The remarks are as clear an indication as any that while the health insurance industry suffered greatly from the recession it remains remarkably well positioned to recoup those profits going forward — principally because companies can raise prices without worrying about the market hit it will take.

The Democratic-authored health care package would eliminate the anti-trust exemption that health insurers enjoy, require insurers to spend a high percentage of their funds on medical costs and create a commission that would oversee unexpected hikes in premiums. And yet, Lewis says that the clients he represents (employers who purchase health care coverage) have largely soured on the reform process even if they are favorable towards the overall goals.

“I think most people would acknowledge that there’s a need for health care reform, employers continue to be very frustrated,” he said. “But I would also say that many of them still view the legislation and the partisanship coming out of Washington as possibly the medicine worse than the disease. So, many employer groups that we’re talking to feel like it would be a shame to lose an opportunity to do something with respect to health care reform. But many are starting to feel like maybe nothing is better than something in this current environment.”

A call to Lewis for additional comment was not immediately returned. Here is the full transcript of his remarks.

From the Huffington-Post.

3 Comments

  1. John Barker on March 9, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    Looks like the insurance companies are gambling that healthcare “reform” will pass. Just think of the windfall they will have when health insurance is mandated. Millions of new customers at inflated prices! If healthcare “reform” doesn’t pass things will stay pretty much as they are–if you want healthcare you will have to pay the premiums or go without healthcare, go bankrupt or die. The hike in premiums is the best illustration healthcare profiteers can make to show that they will not give up their profits at any cost.



  2. arnaudzvmat on July 22, 2011 at 2:56 am

    Yes, thank for the info a million! Have to discover anybody organizing Tea Party. I wants to participate in organizing.

    Gucci Handbag Outlet



  3. Shaad on December 9, 2012 at 3:33 pm

    Usually, when you take a policy out, you sluhod receive an illustration showing the dates and amounts of any direct debit payments that are due. That illustration sluhod have some terms and conditions set out on it, and it will usually say that it is your responsibility to leave those payments in on the due date. It sluhod also say that if you change the date or amount of those payments, you will receive notice in writing of those changes. Until you get that notice in writing, they will argue that the onus is on you to ensure payment is made on the original due dates as you have nothing to say otherwise.That doesn’t stop you appealing though. If you can provide evidence of those bank charges, or evidence of your phone call to them, try writing to them, and they may offer something, but legally, they are only obliged to honour the agreement set out in writing so any offer they make would be a goodwill gesture.The only other alternative would be to claim indemnity on that direct debit payment. The bank would then have to put it back in to your account, and as it sluhod not have been taken, they would have to put the charges back in your account too. The bank would then claim the payment back from the insurer. The only issue then would be that the insurer could revoke your credit agreement as you have technically missed a payment. That would mean going on to annual payments. They could even serve a cancellation notice on to you for non-payment.