Facebook logoTwitter logoYouTube logo

Insurers see way to dodge federal healthcare law next year

A little-known loophole in President Obama’s landmark legislation enables health insurers to extend existing policies for nearly all of 2014.

By Chad Terhune for the Los Angeles Times

A new fight is brewing over health insurance companies letting millions of Americans renew their current coverage for another year — and thereby avoid changes under the federal healthcare law.

That may offer a short-term benefit for certain consumers and shield some of those individual policyholders from potentially steep rate increases. But critics say this maneuver could undermine government efforts to remake the insurance market next year and keep premiums affordable overall.

At issue is a little-known loophole in President Obama’s landmark legislation that enables health insurers to extend existing policies for nearly all of 2014. This runs contrary to the widespread belief that all health insurance must immediately comply with new federal rules starting Jan. 1, when most provisions of the law take effect.

“Insurers are onto this, and the big question is how many will try to game the system,” said Timothy Stoltzfus Jost, a law professor and health policy expert at Washington and Lee University.

Some of the nation’s biggest health insurers are looking to take advantage of this delay, and Arkansas officials are encouraging companies to do this by resetting customers’ renewal dates for the end of December. There’s also concern that some insurers and agents could rush to sell more individual policies before year-end so they could be extended in 2014.

Some policy experts are expressing concern about this practice for fear that insurers will focus on renewing younger and healthier policyholders and hold them out of the broader insurance pool next year. Their absence could leave a sicker and older population in new government insurance exchanges, driving up medical costs and premiums there.

“This could undermine the Affordable Care Act, and it opens the door for exacerbating potential rate shock in the exchanges,” said Christine Monahan, a senior analyst at Georgetown University’s Health Policy Institute. “The health insurers can cherry-pick some healthy people and it raises prices for everyone else.”

This issue could affect some of the 15 million people nationwide who purchase their own coverage and millions more of the uninsured who are expected to join government exchanges next year. It would not pertain to the 150 million Americans who get health benefits through their employers.

Many health insurers are still mulling over their options on how to handle these individual renewals.

“Some carriers will require everyone to switch plans Jan. 1, and other carriers will allow customers to stay on their existing plan as long as possible,” said Bob Hurley, senior vice president of carrier relations at online site eHealthInsurance. “We are trying to nail this down with the carriers. I think it would be better for consumers to have that choice to carry their policy forward.”

The nation’s largest health insurer, UnitedHealth Group Inc. of Minnetonka, Minn., said, “We are currently looking at the best way to serve our customers’ best interests while continuing to comply with the Affordable Care Act going into 2014.”

WellPoint Inc., the Indianapolis insurance giant that runs Blue Cross plans in California and 13 other states, said its renewal practices will vary by state. In California, the company said its Anthem Blue Cross unit may allow individual policyholders to renew through March 31.

Kaiser Permanente, a major nonprofit health plan based in Oakland, said it doesn’t plan to renew policies beyond Jan. 1 in California and most of the other states where it sells coverage.

Richard Kern and his wife, a retired couple in Los Angeles, say they would welcome the flexibility to keep their individual policy from Aetna Inc. for another year amid so much uncertainty over next year’s rates.

“We don’t even know what the prices and alternatives are under Obamacare,” Kern said. “We are waiting for the other shoe to drop.”

If an insurer offers this option, it would then be up to consumers to decide whether they want to renew an existing policy into 2014. The length of any renewal may depend on what month their annual plan year begins.

Many lower-income people will qualify for federal premium subsidies, which will be available only when purchasing new coverage available in state- or federal-run insurance exchanges. It would make financial sense to take advantage of that government aid. Individuals earning less than $46,000 or families below $94,000 annually would be eligible for subsidies.

However, many people who are middle income or above could face significantly higher premiums next year with no subsidies. Those premium increases are tied to federal requirements that insurers accept all applicants regardless of their medical condition and the inclusion of more comprehensive benefits.

Renewing an older policy could mean forgoing some of those richer benefits and new limits on out-of-pocket medical expenses.

Last week, California officials estimated that premiums may rise 30% on average for about 1.3 million existing policyholders primarily because of those changes in the federal law. Insurers have warned that some customers could see their premiums double depending on their age and other factors.

Citing that threat of higher rates, Arkansas officials issued a bulletin to insurers last month describing how they could extend individual policies until Dec. 30, 2013, and then renew them for another year.

These health plans “would not be required to comply with the [Affordable Care Act] market reforms until 12/31/2014,” according to the Arkansas bulletin.

“For those folks who don’t qualify for subsidies, this is a consumer-friendly thing because the premium rates for 2014 will be substantially higher,” said Dan Honey, deputy commissioner of compliance for the Arkansas Insurance Department. “You will be exposed to rate shock.”

Other states may oppose that approach, further underscoring the uneven implementation of the federal healthcare law across the country. Oregon Insurance Commissioner Louis Savage said these renewals could be problematic and his office issued a rule barring any extension beyond March 31, 2014.

“We want to get as many people as possible into the exchange,” Savage said. “I think having renewals go deep into 2014 is counterproductive to the goals of the federal healthcare law.”

In California, state lawmakers are working on legislation that could address this renewal issue and other details about how individual policies comply with the federal overhaul.

These questions over renewals are separate from “grandfathered” health policies that existed before the federal law passed in March 2010. Those plans don’t have to meet all the requirements of the healthcare law as long as insurers or employers don’t make significant changes to them.

Comments

16 Responses to “Insurers see way to dodge federal healthcare law next year”
  1. Stephen Phillips says:

    Leave it to Arkansas to once again “lead the nation”… down the wrong (obstructionist) path….

    For the rest of you more “progressive” states, GET ON BOARD with the program and get to the business of providing Americans with inclusive, affordable health insurance… like the majority of responsible, industrialized “first-world” nations have done – long, long ago!

  2. Bill Corning says:

    This is an administrative nightmare and could easily end up in courts.
    Mr. Phillips- What countries provide their population with Affordable Health Insurance??
    Years ago we learned that Medicare could be provided with 3% administrative costs compared to health insurance companies with 30% costs.
    Health insurance companies are fianancial institutions, they have nothing to do with health. They are to collect money and pay out the least to provide the most profits to their shareholders. In other countries this is called money-laundering and that is all it is here.

    • Teresa M Smith says:

      This is perfect. We need Medicare for all now.

    • Raymond OBrien says:

      You are so correct and switching now to single payer would make it all simple and save huge amounts. DUH–It is painful for the country to go through all this when the answer is so at hand!

  3. Ellen Franzen says:

    What does this mean: “Kaiser Permanente, a major nonprofit health plan based in Oakland, said it doesn’t plan to renew policies beyond Jan. 1 in California and most of the other states where it sells coverage.”? Since there are no stupid questions, I would say that it means that my Kaiser policy will not be renewed. Um, that would be a problem, since I’m 63 and have had melanoma and back surgery. This will be a disaster. We do need Medicare for all now!

  4. David S. says:

    @Bill Corning,
    I bet Stephen Phillips meant to say “Affordable Health Coverage” or “Health Care”. It’s unfortunate that the word “health insurance” has become equivalent to health care, placing that entire system on a pedestal of necessity.

    People don’t need health insurance, they don’t need a processing system for money that is loaded up with marketing costs and bribes to congressmen. People need health care, plain and simple.

    As someone who has worked in IT in 5 companies across different industries, I can tell you for sure that the private sector doesn’t know what the hell they are doing any more than government does. If the companies I’ve worked for could efficiently process data with a 3% overhead, they’d have been 10 times more successful.

    • Carla says:

      Oh, the private sector certainly know what they are doing. They are making money, hand over fist and they are “all about greed.” This greed will bring our country to its knees and we shall rapidly become a third world nation, with only the ultra wealthy having health care, education and safety.

      • Denise Libien says:

        Incredibly well put- i absolutely agree that this is exactly what is going on in the U.S.

  5. Nick Lento says:

    It’s clear that the health insurance establishment along with the whole medical industrial complex will do all
    The can to sabotage Obamacare by creating chaos and disruption.

    It’s up o the administration and progressives to strike back with the only real weapon that fear, tthat is the threat of single payer.

    Clearly, that kind of gutsy initiative will not be forthcoming from the administration…if the single payer movement exploits the greed and stupidity of the opposition…and public opinion comes to blame the insurance companies for whist they will have done…..then that back lash just may get Obamo to realize that the insurance industry is his enemy and not anything he can trust to any extent. The have been sabotaging him since day one and they will not ever stop…they see him as their absolute enemy while he has been snookered by them in all ways.

    If the insurance industry wasn’t so stupidly greedy and short sighted they would be doing all they could to make Obamacare work smoothly for everyone…but they are incapable of/unwilling to see the whole picture and act with genuine intelligence. They are blinded by their greed.

    The reality is that we will eventually have single payer. The only question is how long it will take.

    A greed driven healthcare system is simply not sustainable. There is not enough money in this world to satisfy the greed of of the individuals now in charge of our health care system.

    Single payer is just the beginning of the changes needed…not the end.

    • Nick Lento says:

      Apologies for all the typos there….should have proofread it. But y’all get the idea.

  6. Dee says:

    LET’S PUT THE GREEDY PRIVATE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OUT OF BUSINESS!!!! AND DEMAND SINGLE-PAYER HEALTHCARE FOR ALL NOW!!!!!!

  7. mila says:

    This country is at its best with money making/capitalism… so a single-payer system’s not in offing and venture to say never will be – unless majority of the people unite!

  8. health says:

    It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and
    it’s time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you some interesting things or advice. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article. I want to read more things about it!

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. […] Insurers see way to dodge federal healthcare law next year […]